Trump Judge Dumps Blue Moon Craft Beer Lawsuit for the Second Time

By Mike Pomranz |
FWX BLUE MOON LAWSUIT

© David Anthony / Alamy

The third time will not be a charm for a plaintiff who felt mislead about the craft-worthiness of Blue Moon beer—a brew actually made by one of the world’s big beer conglomerates, MillerCoors. After hearing the plaintiff’s arguments a second time around, a federal judge dismissed the class action claim and told plaintiff Evan Parent not to bother coming back.

The lawsuit was originally filed back in May of last year, after Parent suggested that the marketing of Blue Moon beer was deceptive and misleading because it didn’t contain information about MillerCoors on the label. Parent’s argument appeared to focus on the idea that Blue Moon was advertised as if it was a “craft beer” despite not fitting the definition of the term laid out by the Brewers Association, a trade group for small and independent breweries.

In October, U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel (the Indiana-not-Mexican-born judge also presiding over the Trump University fraud case) essentially told Parent to go back to the drawing board, tentatively dismissing the suit but stating, “The court does not find it impossible that the plaintiff could allege other facts as to MillerCoors’ advertising or sales practices that would support their claim that MillerCoors deceptively or misleadingly represents Blue Moon as a craft beer.”

But after giving Parent a chance to redo his work, Curiel was far more firm with his second ruling. “Having already given plaintiff a second opportunity to plead his case, and having found the merits lacking, the court finds that at this juncture, amendment would be futile,” said the judge. “Accordingly, the court denies plaintiff leave to amend.”

Related: ULTIMATE BREWERY TOUR OF THE U.S. ACCORDING TO SCIENCE

In the end, Parent was unable to get the judge to bite on a number of claims, including that Blue Moon’s advertising was misleading, that its placement alongside craft beers in stores was under MillerCoors control or that the beer’s price was a representation of its craft credentials, all of which he alleged MillerCoors was able to use to make people believe Blue Moon is something Parent thinks it is not.

At the very least, Parent was able to let the world knows how he feels about Blue Moon – though his attempts to do so through the court system we’re not very lucrative, unlike, say, the how lucrative Blue Moon has been for MillerCoors.

MORE FROM THE INTERWEBS
Comments

Video Section

0