The third time will not be a charm for a plaintiff who felt mislead about the craft-worthiness of Blue Moon beer—a brew actually made by one of the world’s big beer conglomerates, MillerCoors. After hearing the plaintiff’s arguments a second time around, a federal judge dismissed the class action claim and told plaintiff Evan Parent not to bother coming back.
The lawsuit was originally filed back in May of last year, after Parent suggested that the marketing of Blue Moon beer was deceptive and misleading because it didn’t contain information about MillerCoors on the label. Parent’s argument appeared to focus on the idea that Blue Moon was advertised as if it was a “craft beer” despite not fitting the definition of the term laid out by the Brewers Association, a trade group for small and independent breweries.
In October, U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel (the Indiana-not-Mexican-born judge also presiding over the Trump University fraud case) essentially told Parent to go back to the drawing board, tentatively dismissing the suit but stating, “The court does not find it impossible that the plaintiff could allege other facts as to MillerCoors’ advertising or sales practices that would support their claim that MillerCoors deceptively or misleadingly represents Blue Moon as a craft beer.”