- This Artist Will Custom-Paint Your Stand Mixer — and Beyoncé is a Customer!
- Some of New York's Swankiest Restaurants Are Hosting a Bake Sale for Planned Parenthood
- Exactly What Selena Gomez Eats Every Single Morning
- Watch a Young Mary Berry Put Fish in the Blender in These Amazing Vintage Cooking Segments
- These Fourth Graders Are Lobbying Wisconsin to Make Cheese an Official State Symbol
- A Shanghai Restaurant Bombards Your Senses With Dancing Waiters and a Nintendo Soundtrack
- Deep Clean Your Cast Iron Skillet With This Miraculous Gadget
- Hungary Tries to Ban Use of Red Stars, Probably Just to Spite Heineken
- This Chef's Food Photos Are Terrifying
- Peeps Flavored Italian Ice Is a Thing
The Supreme Court and the case of the red grouper.
The Supreme Court’s 2014-15 term was gaveled to order this morning, and on the docket this season will be a case about a crate of grouper. Back in 2007 a fisherman was cited for pulling in 72 undersized grouper from the Gulf of Mexico. But before the fish could be seized, he threw them back in the water and caught some new ones. The fisherman was charged with destroying or concealing “a tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence” a governmental investigation, a law that most of the time bans people from shredding documents. Is a fish a “tangible object,” is it a piece of evidence? Or is it, you know, a fish? The Court will let us know.