If you think visually-induced food FOMO is a phenomenon that started with the advent of Instagram, here's a study that will disabuse you of that naive notion. The Cornell Food and Brand Lab looked at the history of food in modern art and found that for hundreds of years, images of food have predominantly been elaborately staged and somewhat misleading affairs.
In an analysis of more than 750 Western European and American paintings of food between the years of 1500 to 2000, the team at Cornell concluded that historically, food images have been more about conveying a certain level of status rather than documenting the foods people of the time typically ate. The lavish banquet portraits of the Renaissance were actually just painstakingly painted counterparts to your foodie friend's carefully staged brunch Snaps. They are were mostly used as a way to show off wealth and prosperity.
- This Artist Steals Forks of the Rich and Famous
- Get All the Likes with an Instagrammable Power Bowl
- Instagramming Your Food Could Make It Taste Better
Many of the food paintings from this era included non-native foods and ingredients that had to be imported—a luxury at the time—such as the non-indigenous lemons featured in more than half of the Dutch paintings studies, or olives, which were featured in paintings from many countries except their native Italy. Fruits, considered a treat, were featured much more prominently in these early works than vegetables, which were more readily available to the common people.